Holdem check in the dark
A player is said to be taking a betting action in the dark if they take that action before seeing the card(s) that are dealt just prior to the betting round. The most common uses of this phrase are to check in the dark and to bet in . Check in the dark. Created by TLR on July 23, Definition. A declaration by the player who is first to act before a community card is dealt, declaring a check regardless of the outcome of the community cards. The advantage of checking in the dark is to negate the positional disadvantage by not revealing information by acting first The . In hold'em, people typically check in the dark when they have a drawing hand, or a medium strength hand that could improve to a very strong hand, but cannot take a lot of heat if it does not improve. The idea is not to give any information to the opponent, to try to lessen the disadvantage of being out of position.
In the dark
A player is said to be taking a betting action in the dark if they take that action before seeing the card s that are dealt just prior to the betting round. The most common uses of this phrase are to check in the dark and to bet in the dark , most often in either Hold 'em or Omaha.
Since taking an action in the dark is an unusual situation, it generally cannot be done via hand signals e. In some casinos , even putting chips out to indicate you are betting in the dark may not be binding, although in most casinos the act of placing chips beyond the commitment line would be binding.
The phrase comes from the idea of betting without sight, as though there were no light in the room and you were unable to see the cards. Once the cards are exposed, you then have "light" and can see the cards to bet on. A player can only act in the dark if they are first to act on the forthcoming betting rounds. Once the first player has acted in the dark, the second player may also choose to act in the dark, at which point the third player may also choose to do so, and so on.
But a player may not act in the dark if they follow a player who has not acted in the dark. Dark actions are generally considered binding in casinos, though some casinos may have house rules that state that dark actions are not allowed, in which case stating you are taking an action in the dark would not be binding.
(snuff) 139. As he kissed her, a flood of bloody and bile gushed up, into his mouth. Кто же в наши дни не хочет капельку нежности и тепла, подаренного страстным и очень горячим сексуальным человеком. Одна из девах даже наполнила свой рот этой белой жидкостью и размазала ее по своим губам. Вспомнила, что у нее руки свободны, - с ухмылкой подумал Дэниел.
I was recently at a table with a player who often yelled "check blind! I'm guessing that this was just a standard "check to the raiser" in combination with wanting to reduce positional disadvantage by letting everyone know that the content of the flop didn't influence the decision to check.
What interested me was that there were some instances where that guy had the opportunity to check blindly but didn't do so.
At the time, I couldn't figure out how to use that information. Checking in the dark is a high level play to reestablish position on the flop. It is essentially a way of giving away less information regarding your hand and how it relates to the flop.
You reestablish position by making your opponent the "first to act" on the flop bet. The blind check gives no information regarding the strength of your hand in relation to the flop, so therefore hands that have more value the further they are disguised like drawing hands , are protected more by checking blind.
AK can be seen as a drawing hand and if you check dark and hit an A or K, the strength of your hand is disguised more and allows you an opportunity to earn more for making your hand. A beginner who tries this play won't be able to leverage its power as much. The good thing that if you play against someone who uses this is that you will always have the option of seeing the turn card for free, should you wish.
In this day and age, you'd be hard-pressed to find a poker player who doesn't know what a continuation bet is. The upsides of the c-bet are obvious: Often, you'll win the pot without a fight - making the continuation bet a great tool in a poker player's arsenal. Where you start running into problems, though, is when you start automatically c-betting every single time you raise before the flop.
Yes, continuation betting is profitable. But not when you do it every single time. There needs to be a middle ground or else you become predictable and, ultimately, exploitable. If you raise before the flop and are then called by multiple opponents, your continuation bet will rarely, if ever, work. The more players in the pot, the greater the chance you'll be called in one or more spot s. A continuation bet, by definition, is a mini-bluff using the fold equity you've gained by being the pre-flop raiser.
With more players in the pot, your fold equity diminishes and you will be called more often. When there is a high likelihood of you being called, you're better off betting made hands than making bluffs. For the reasons discussed above, when you find yourself up against calling stations you should frequently be c-betting less.
As the old adage goes, you can't bluff a calling station. Now, that isn't to say you should give it up completely. You need to take your particular opponent into consideration before deciding your optimal play. If your calling-station opponent is the type to peel the flop very lightly, but then frequently fold to a turn bet, then absolutely, keep continuation betting the flop. Just be ready to fire another barrel on the turn!
These are some of the most profitable players to play against. Calling stations love to call, so let them. But bet a higher mix of your good hands and keep your bluffs and continuation bets to a minimum. Some flops are better than others for continuation bets. If your opponents hit the flop, they're more likely to call.