Holdem rule of 4 and 2
I know that this may cause some heated discussion, but does any other member think that the Rule is seriously flawed statistically? The. Get started playing Texas Holdem in just a few minutes! PokerListings - The Player 4 - Calls the big Do you have a reference for this rule as we had the. Rules of Poker - Texas Hold'em. Texas Hold'em (or just "hold'em" for short) is currently the most popular variation of poker, thanks mainly to televised coverage of the World Series of Poker, the World Poker Tour, and various celebrity-based events.
How to Play Texas Hold'em | Texas Holdem Rules
The Binions agreed and ever since no-limit Texas hold 'em has been played as the main event. The odds of completing our flush are worse than the odds we are getting from the pot, therefore we should fold. Join more than , active members on our forum. Small-stakes games often involve more players in each hand and can vary from extremely passive little raising and betting to extremely aggressive many raises. The program exhibits more variation in its tactics than professional players do, for instance bluffing with weak hands that professional players tend to fold.
Texas hold 'em
Up your game with free cardschat membership. This is a discussion on The paradox of the "4 and 2" rule within the online poker forums, in the Cash Games section; As a beginning player, i read about the "4 and 2" rule everywhere I turned, and soon adopted it into my game. The paradox of the "4 and 2" rule. As a beginning player, i read about the "4 and 2" rule everywhere I turned, and soon adopted it into my game. As you know, the rule says that when deciding to call, you can more or less multiply your outs by 4 on the flop, by 2 on the river, so see if you have pot odds.
Here is the paradox: General advise is make a pot-sized bet, which often falls well within the rule. I started this topic in the Learning forum, as I thought someone could easily tell me what to do. It seems to me now that the rule has little merit and we are closer to a rule.
In other words, on the receiving end we should call MUCH fewer hands on the flop than what for instance I have done so far. The reason is mainly that when calling the flop, you will also have to call on the turn - unless you are already allin. You can call it "reverse" implied odds? What do you think? That amount of a bet also gives seasoned players the idea that you want them to call. This may cause a fold from the other players and won't damage you too badly if you don't catch.
If you catch then bet the pot. If you dont catch then betting a remaining player almost half in will cause a fold more often than not.. Originally Posted by CistaCista. The 4 part of the 2 4 rule only applies if you see both the turn and river for one bet. Originally Posted by buster Join the Conversation at CardsChat. CardsChat is an online poker community of , members in countries. Why more than , poker players have joined CardsChat Quickly improve your game. Learn from online pros.
Учусь писать, и это тренировочный рассказ. У похотливой барышни есть свой архив откровенных фотографий, в котором показано как игривая миледи принимает ванну или отдыхает голышом на море. - Милый, я на самом деле хочу. Benny began crawling onto Jake. Вам предоставляется коллекция фотографий, на которых запечатлены девушки в чулках.
Up your game with free cardschat membership. This is a discussion on Rule of within the online poker forums, in the Learning Poker section; I know that this may cause some heated discussion, but does any other member think that the Rule is seriously flawed statistically? Running Nose II . I know that this may cause some heated discussion, but does any other member think that the Rule is seriously flawed statistically?
The reason is that it uses figures to combine the turn and the river to show a composite result It then goes on to justify this figure to give an answer for the outs on the turn. Assuming a flush draw, two in hand and two on the flop, there are 47 unknown after the flop and 46 after the turn.
One card of a difference. There can't be that amount of difference between percentages and odds. It gives a good enough approximation within an acceptable margin of error considering that our opponents exact hand is unknown. Sure, it might be off by a few percent, but that difference is surely smaller than the uncertainty of the exact range we are up against.
It gives us a good idea if we have enough equity to continue. If the numbers are far from close we easily have enough equity or we clearly don't , our decision won't change based on the error. If things are really close, it is just going to be a marginal decision either way. In that case, the error of the calculation isn't our biggest confounding factor. The best thing to do is memorize odds for common situations. That way you are not having to do extra calculations when you are playing.
This is very useful when multi-tabling. Otherwise you can do a standard calculation or compute as: If you want 0. It is certainly useful to know the proper maths but I wouldn't bother yet.
In this day and age, you'd be hard-pressed to find a poker player who doesn't know what a continuation bet is. The upsides of the c-bet are obvious: Often, you'll win the pot without a fight - making the continuation bet a great tool in a poker player's arsenal.
Where you start running into problems, though, is when you start automatically c-betting every single time you raise before the flop. Yes, continuation betting is profitable. But not when you do it every single time. There needs to be a middle ground or else you become predictable and, ultimately, exploitable.
If you raise before the flop and are then called by multiple opponents, your continuation bet will rarely, if ever, work. The more players in the pot, the greater the chance you'll be called in one or more spot s.
A continuation bet, by definition, is a mini-bluff using the fold equity you've gained by being the pre-flop raiser. With more players in the pot, your fold equity diminishes and you will be called more often. When there is a high likelihood of you being called, you're better off betting made hands than making bluffs.
For the reasons discussed above, when you find yourself up against calling stations you should frequently be c-betting less. As the old adage goes, you can't bluff a calling station. Now, that isn't to say you should give it up completely. You need to take your particular opponent into consideration before deciding your optimal play. If your calling-station opponent is the type to peel the flop very lightly, but then frequently fold to a turn bet, then absolutely, keep continuation betting the flop.